Miller et al v. Laidlaw & Company (UK) LTD et al
| Sheldon Miller, Bruce Seyburn, Arthur Wirth and James Randolph |
| Stephen Gianntonio, Peter Silverman, Laidlaw & Company (UK) LTD, Hugh Regan, Ted Fowler, Jason Russo and Todd Cirella |
| 2:2011cv12086 |
| May 11, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Detroit Office |
| Oakland |
| Denise Page Hood |
| Mark A. Randon |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
59
ORDER Granting In Part and Denying In Part, Defendants' Motion to Amend/Clarify the Court's March 28, 2013, Order 47 . Signed by District Judge Denise Page Hood. (LSau)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER Denying Defendants' 45 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge Denise Page Hood. (Monda, H)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER Granting In Part Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint 35 . Signed by District Judge Denise Page Hood. (LSau)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER Granting Defendants' Motion for Reconsideration 34 and Denying Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration 33 . Signed by District Judge Denise Page Hood. (LSau)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER granting in part 15 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(B)(2) and granting in part 16 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rules 8, 9, and 12(B)(6). Signed by District Judge Denise Page Hood. (JOwe)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
