Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Randolph v. Bridge Investment Group Holding Incorporated
as 2:2023cv02703
Plaintiff:
James Randolph
Defendant:
Bridge Investment Group Holding Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023hc02275
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4241 Motion to Determine Mental Competency/Other Dist.
ALLAMONG v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv18068
Plaintiff:
JAMES RANDOLPH ALLAMONG JR.
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Randolph v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv05845
Plaintiff:
James Randolph
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Phillip Cline, Debra Kirby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Menger v. Wages et al
as 6:2022cv00172
Plaintiff:
Gusi J. Menger and Heather V. Menger
Defendant:
Randy Wages, James Randolph, Kristy Wages and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
USA v. James Sherman
as 21-10167
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES RANDOLPH SHERMAN
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
SPRINGER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv25063
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES RANDOLPH SPRINGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States v. Excell Randolph
as 21-1531
Defendant / Appellant:
Excell James Randolph, also known as Ism
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
OTIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv26461
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES RANDOLPH OTIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
OTIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv17980
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES RANDOLPH OTIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
