Staples v. United States of America et al
| William Staples |
| United States of America, Charles Samuel, Jr., Harrell Watts, Stone, Murphy, Bowman and John Doe |
| 2:2016cv12367 |
| June 23, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Detroit Office |
| XX Outside US |
| Stephanie Dawkins Davis |
| Gershwin A. Drain |
| Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
24
OPINION and ORDER Summarily Dismissing the 1 Complaint. Signed by District Judge Gershwin A. Drain. (TMcg)
|
|
Filing
11
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 9 , DIRECTING SERVICE WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF COSTS, AND AUTHORIZING THE UNITED STATES MARSHAL TO COLLECT COSTS AFTER SERVICE IS MADE. Signed by District Judge Gershwin A. Drain. (TBan)
|
|
Filing
8
SECOND ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL, DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO PROVIDE THE COURT WITH THE INFORMATION AND DOCUMENTATION NEEDED TO EFFECTUATE SERVICE UPON THE REMAINING DEFENDANTS, AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR CORRESPONDENCE TO BE SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL 7 . Signed by District Judge Gershwin A. Drain. (TBan)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL AND ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO PROVIDE THE COURT WITH THE INFORMATION AND DOCUMENTATION NEEDED TO EFFECTUATE SERVICE UPON THE REMAINING DEFENDANTS. Signed by District Judge Gershwin A. Drain. (DPar)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
