Carhartt, Inc. v. Innovative Textiles, Inc.
Plaintiff: Carhartt, Inc.
Defendant: Innovative Textiles, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2017cv13604
Filed: November 3, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Office: Ann Arbor Office
County: Wayne
Presiding Judge: Judith E. Levy
Presiding Judge: R. Steven Whalen
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 210 OPINION and ORDER re 141 MOTION for Summary Judgment , 151 MOTION for Summary Judgment Signed by District Judge Judith E. Levy. (WBar)
April 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 208 OPINION AND ORDER granting 148 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Judith E. Levy. (WBar)
February 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 206 OPINION and ORDER Granting in Part 141 MOTION for Summary Judgment; and Denying in Part 151 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Judith E. Levy. (WBar)
October 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 179 OPINION and ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT/THIRD PARTY PLAINTIFF'S 109 Amended MOTION to Compel Discovery Regarding Communications Exchanged Between and Information Considered by Carhartt's Four-Person "Product Notification" Te am AND DENYING DEFENDANT/THIRD PARTY PLAINTIFF'S 98 MOTION to Compel Discovery Regarding Communications Exchanged Between and Information Considered by Carhartt's Four-Person "Product Notification" Team filed by Innovative Textiles LLC, Innovative Textiles, Inc. - Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen. (CCie)
October 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 155 OPINION and ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S / THIRD PARTY PLAINTIFF'S 64 MOTION to Compel a More Detailed Privilege Log from Plaintiff Carhartt - Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen. (CCie)
May 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 123 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S 84 Motion to Compel- Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen. (CCie)
December 4, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 53 OPINION and ORDER Denying in Part and Granting in Part Gentry Mills, Inc's 39 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge Judith E. Levy. (SBur)
July 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER Regarding 39 Motion for Reconsideration and Requiring Additional Briefing. (Response due by 8/17/2018, Reply due by 8/31/2018) Signed by District Judge Judith E. Levy. (SBur)
June 11, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 33 OPINION and ORDER Granting Gnetry Mills, Inc.'s 18 Motion to Dismiss the Third-Party Complaint. Signed by District Judge Judith E. Levy. (SBur)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Carhartt, Inc. v. Innovative Textiles, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carhartt, Inc.
Represented By: Erin M. Pawlowski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Innovative Textiles, Inc.
Represented By: David C. Anderson
Represented By: Colleen H. Burke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?