Word v. Christiansen
| Jerry Word |
| Michigan Department of Corrections and John Christiansen |
| 2:2018cv13314 |
| October 24, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Victoria A Roberts |
| R Steven Whalen |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrea M. Christensen-Brown on behalf of John Christiansen. (Christensen-Brown, Andrea) |
Filing 6
ORDER Requiring Response to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Response due by 5/28/2019 Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen. (NAhm)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #2 Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen. (NAhm)
|
| TEXT-ONLY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #6 Order Requiring Responsive Pleading, #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus on John Christiansen and Michigan Attorney General. (NAhm) |
| Filing 4 Notice Regarding Parties' Responsibility to Notify Court of Address Changes (KCas) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Compel and Invoke Discovery by Jerry Word. (DAll) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION to Proceed without prepaying fees or costs by Jerry Word. (DAll) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Jerry Word against John Christiansen, Michigan Department of Corrections. (DAll) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
