Beaver v. Macomb County et al
Plaintiff: Anjanette Beaver
Defendant: Andrew McKinnon, Jacqueline Fontenot, Patricia Roland, Spitz Pathology Group, PLLC, Daniel Spitz, Macomb County and William Ridella
Case Number: 2:2021cv10750
Filed: April 2, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Terrence G Berg
Referring Judge: Paul D Borman
2 Judge: Elizabeth A Stafford
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 17 MOTION to Dismiss and Brief in Support of Motion by Daniel Spitz, Spitz Pathology Group, PLLC. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A - Macomb County-SPG Contract, #3 Exhibit B - Arms v Lapeer Co Med Care Facility, #4 Exhibit C - Barachkov v 41B District Court, #5 Exhibit D - Ibarra v Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government, #6 Exhibit E - Dunleavy v Wayne County Commission, #7 Exhibit F - Affidavit of Daniel Spitz MD, #8 Exhibit G - Slee v Woodhull Twp, #9 Exhibit H - Cowell v American Red Cross, #10 Exhibit I - Sanford v Main St. Baptist Church Manor) (Bernard, Daniel)
May 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses with Jury Demand by Patricia Roland. (Peacock, Peter)
May 18, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 NOTICE TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE: Scheduling Conference set for 7/14/2021 10:30 AM before District Judge Terrence G. Berg (AChu)
May 18, 2021 Opinion or Order Set Deadlines/Hearings (Corrected): TELEPHONIC Scheduling Conference set for 6/14/2021 10:30 AM before District Judge Terrence G. Berg (AChu)
May 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses by Jacqueline Fontenot, Macomb County, Andrew McKinnon, William Ridella. (Jensen, Peter)
May 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Peter W. Peacock appearing on behalf of Patricia Roland (Peacock, Peter)
May 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel J. Bernard on behalf of Daniel Spitz, Spitz Pathology Group, PLLC. (Bernard, Daniel)
April 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: John A. Schapka appearing on behalf of William Ridella (Schapka, John)
April 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Peter C. Jensen appearing on behalf of William Ridella (Jensen, Peter)
April 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Patricia Roland served on 4/20/2021, answer due 5/11/2021. (Sklar, Joel)
April 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Spitz Pathology Group, PLLC served on 4/20/2021, answer due 5/11/2021. (Sklar, Joel)
April 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Daniel Spitz served on 4/20/2021, answer due 5/11/2021. (Sklar, Joel)
April 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: John A. Schapka appearing on behalf of Jacqueline Fontenot, Macomb County, Andrew McKinnon, William Ridella (Schapka, John)
April 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Peter C. Jensen appearing on behalf of Jacqueline Fontenot, Macomb County, Andrew McKinnon, William Ridella (Jensen, Peter)
April 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Jacqueline Fontenot waiver sent on 4/15/2021, answer due 6/14/2021; Macomb County waiver sent on 4/15/2021, answer due 6/14/2021; Andrew McKinnon waiver sent on 4/15/2021, answer due 6/14/2021; William Ridella waiver sent on 4/15/2021, answer due 6/14/2021. (Sklar, Joel)
April 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE from District Judge Paul D. Borman to District Judge Terrence G. Berg. (NAhm)
April 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *Jacqueline Fontenot, Macomb County, Andrew McKinnon, William Ridella, Patricia Roland, Daniel Spitz, Spitz Pathology Group, PLLC* (TTho)
April 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Anjanette Beaver against All Defendants with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-8411337 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: Macomb - County Where Action Arose: Macomb - County of 1st Defendant: Macomb. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, 20-cv-12995, Judge Terrence G. Berg] (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A - Spitz/SPG Agreement, #3 Exhibit B - EEOC Charge, #4 Exhibit C News Articles, #5 Exhibit D - Second Charge of Discrimination, #6 Exhibit E - MIOSHA 02/18/2021 Letter to Fontenot, with attachments, #7 Exhibit F - Constructive Discharge Letter, #8 Exhibit G - RTS) (Sklar, Joel)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Beaver v. Macomb County et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew McKinnon
Represented By: Peter C. Jensen
Represented By: John A. Schapka
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jacqueline Fontenot
Represented By: Peter C. Jensen
Represented By: John A. Schapka
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Patricia Roland
Represented By: Peter W. Peacock
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Spitz Pathology Group, PLLC
Represented By: Daniel J. Bernard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Daniel Spitz
Represented By: Daniel J. Bernard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Macomb County
Represented By: Peter C. Jensen
Represented By: John A. Schapka
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: William Ridella
Represented By: Peter C. Jensen
Represented By: John A. Schapka
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anjanette Beaver
Represented By: Joel B. Sklar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?