Washington v. Burgess
Kalvin L. Washington |
Connie Horton and Michael Burgess |
2:2022cv10331 |
February 8, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Mark A Goldsmith |
Curtis Ivy |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Notice Regarding Parties' Responsibility to Notify Court of Address Changes (KCas) |
Filing 8 APPLICATION to proceed without prepaying fees or costs by Kalvin L. Washington; with prison account statement. (DPer) |
Filing 7 AMENDED APPLICATION to enforce final judgment of acquittal by Kalvin L. Washington. (DPer) |
Deficiency corrected re #5 Order. (DPer) |
Filing 5 ORDER to Correct Deficiency for failure to submit filing fee. Correction due by 3/16/2022 Signed by Magistrate Judge David R. Grand. (SKra) |
Filing 4 Order Amending Case Caption. Signed by Magistrate Judge David R. Grand. (SKra) |
TEXT-ONLY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #4 Order Amending Case Caption, #5 Order to Correct Deficiency (Habeas and 1983 Complaints Only) on Kalvin L. Washington Pris. No. 493833 at 1500 CABERFAE HIGHWAY, MANISTEE, MI 49660. (SKra) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Immediate Release From Illegal State Custody by Kalvin L. Washington. (SKra) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Kalvin L. Washington. (NAhm) |
Filing 1 [MOTION] PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Kalvin L. Washington against Connie Horton. (Attachments: #1 Cover sheet) (NAhm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.