Cases 1 - 10 of 141
Thomas Carter v. Michael Burgess
as 24-1396
Petitioner:
THOMAS TYRONE CARTER
Respondent:
MICHAEL BURGESS, Warden
Turner #746944 v. Pelky et al
as 1:2024cv00348
Plaintiff:
Lionel E. Turner #746944
Defendant:
Unknown Pelky, Patrick Miseta, Jason Erway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jay Waller v. Michael Burgess, et al
as 24-1222
Plaintiff:
JAY ANTHONY WALLER
Defendant:
WARDEN MICHAEL BURGESS, Personal capacity, THOMAS PARISH, Former Warden personal capacity, DEPUTY WARDEN JEFFREY CLOUSE, Personal Capacity and others
Gresham #272603 v. Awomolo et al
as 1:2024cv00242
Defendant:
A. Awomolo, Double A, Unknown Shembarger and others
Plaintiff:
RESTRICTED FILER Michael Gresham #272603
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burgess #332553 v. Thornell et al
as 3:2024cv08042
Petitioner:
Jeremiah Michael Burgess
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnny Davis v. Michael Burgess
as 24-1154
Petitioner:
JOHNNY WAYNE DAVIS
Respondent:
MICHAEL BURGESS, Warden
Greg Breneman v. Michael Burgess
as 24-1140
Petitioner:
GREG ALLEN BRENEMAN
Respondent:
MICHAEL BURGESS
Aaron Clark, IV v. C. Wilson, et al
as 24-1128
Plaintiff:
AARON CLARK, IV
Defendant:
TIMOTHY PERTTU, Resident Unit Manager, in personal capacity, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SKYTTA, in personal capacity, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MICHAELSON, in personal capacity and others
Jonathon Edick v. Michael Burgess
as 24-1109
Petitioner:
JONATHON EDICK and JONATHON LOYD EDICK
Respondent:
MICHAEL BURGESS, Warden, identified on initiating document as People of the State of Michigan
Velez #800880 v. Burgess et al
as 1:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Edwin Velez #800880
Defendant:
Michael Burgess, Unknown Dehl, Unknown Tighe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
