Adams v. Laskey et al
Raymond W. Adams |
Laskey, Tofil, Campbell and Scarbourgh |
2:2023cv10108 |
January 13, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Patricia T Morris |
George Caram Steeh |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 OPINION AND ORDER denying #6 Motion to Reopen Case and Extend the Time to Cure the Filing Deficiency. Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (MLan) |
TEXT-ONLY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #7 Order on Motion to Reopen Case on Raymond W. Adams Pris. No. 12537-040 at P.O. Box 1000, Butner, NC 27509. (MLan) |
Filing 6 MOTION TO EXTENSION of time and MOTION to Reopen Case by Raymond W. Adams. (SKra) |
Filing 5 OPINION AND ORDER OF SUMMARY DISMISSAL. Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (MLan) |
TEXT-ONLY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #5 Order Dismissing Case on Raymond W. Adams Pris. No. 12537-040 at P.O. Box 1000, Butner, NC 27509. (MLan) |
Filing 4 Notice Regarding Parties' Responsibility to Notify Court of Address Changes (KCas) |
Filing 3 APPLICATION to Proceed without prepaying fees or costs by Raymond W. Adams. (SKra) |
Filing 2 ORDER to Correct Deficiency for failure to submit filing fee. Correction due by 2/16/2023 Signed by Magistrate Judge David R. Grand. (TTho) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Raymond W. Adams against Campbell, Laskey, Scarbourgh, Tofil (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet) (SKra) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.