Cases 1 - 10 of 96
Covel et al v. Town of Bedford et al
as 1:2026cv13754
Defendant:
Mohamad Aldon, Town of Bedford, John C. Fisher and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Covel and Silva Sarian Covel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
O'Toole, et al. v. Nickelodeon Animation Studio, Inc., et al.
as 25-6720
Plaintiff:
HUNTER J. O'TOOLE and ALETHEA O'TOOLE
Defendant:
NICKELODEON ANIMATION STUDIO, INC., NATIONAL AMUSEMENTS, INC., PARAMOUNT GLOBAL, INC. and others
LASKEY et al v. MMG INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2025cv01570
Plaintiff:
JACOB LASKEY and BROOKE LASKEY
Defendant:
MMG INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other
Hoppe et al v. 3M COMPANY (f/k/a Minnesota et al
as 2:2025cv11341
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Hoppe, Jason Hunter, George Hutchinson and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY (f/k/a Minnesota, AGC Chemical Americas Inc., Amerex Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Laskey v. USCIS et al
as 2:2025cv01129
Plaintiff:
Zachary Laskey
Defendant:
USCIS, Pam Bondi, Angelica Alfonso-Royals and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
United States v. Laskey
as 25-5087
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MILLARD RAY LASKEY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 25-1405
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Laskey v. Warden
as 5:2025cv00041
Petitioner:
Millard Ray Laskey
Respondent:
Warden FCI Texarkana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Laskey v. Warden
as 4:2025cv00146
Petitioner:
Millard Ray Laskey
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00986
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
