Whorton v. Coy et al
James M. Whorton |
Coy, Guse, Heinonen, Hopson, Chenault and Lee |
2:2024cv10167 |
January 22, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Jonathan JC Grey |
Elizabeth A Stafford |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 NOTICE of Limited Appearance by Austin C. Raines on behalf of Chenault, Coy, Guse, Heinonen, Hopson, Lee for the purposes of the Pro Se Prisoner Early Mediation Program. (Raines, Austin) |
Filing 6 ORDER STAYING CASE and Referral to the Pro Se Prisoner Early Mediation Program Signed by District Judge Jonathan J.C. Grey. (SOso) |
Filing 5 ORDER granting #2 Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. Signed by Magistrate Judge David R. Grand. (MCho) |
TEXT-ONLY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #6 Order Staying Case mailed to James M. Whorton Pris. No. 321193 at Woodland Center Correctional Facility 9036 E M-36, Whitmore Lake, MI 48189. (SOso) |
Filing 4 Notice Regarding Parties' Responsibility to Notify Court of Address Changes (MCho) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Mediation Program (LGra) |
Filing 2 AUTHORIZATION for withdrawal of funds to pay the Civil Action Filing with a Certificate of Prisoner Inst/Trust Fund Account Activity attached by All Defendants. (LGra) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by James M. Whorton against All Defendants (Attachments: #1 Document Continuation Civil Cover Sheet) (LGra) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.