Crypton LLC v. Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
Plaintiff: Crypton LLC
Defendant: Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2024cv12201
Filed: August 21, 2024
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: David R. Grand
Referring Judge: Susan K DeClercq
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 10, 2024 Filing 9 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Jill M. Pietrini appearing on behalf of Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (Pietrini, Jill)
October 7, 2024 Filing 8 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Brian D. Wassom appearing on behalf of Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (Wassom, Brian)
October 4, 2024 Filing 7 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Paul Alexander Bost appearing on behalf of Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (Bost, Paul)
October 3, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 6 STIPULATED ORDER Extending Response Deadline. First responsive pleading due: 11/6/2024. Signed by District Judge Susan K. DeClercq. (LVer)
September 17, 2024 Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Williams-Sonoma, Inc. served on 9/16/2024, answer due 10/7/2024. (Jakubowski, Matthew) Modified on 9/18/2024 (ABun). {NO GREEN CARD PROVIDED)
August 22, 2024 Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued for *Williams-Sonoma, Inc.* (CShr)
August 22, 2024 A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (CShr)
August 21, 2024 Filing 3 Trademark Report Sent To Washington (Jakubowski, Matthew)
August 21, 2024 Filing 2 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Crypton LLC identifying Corporate Parent Berkley Capital, LLC for Crypton LLC. (Jakubowski, Matthew)
August 21, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Crypton LLC against Williams-Sonoma, Inc. with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9910259 - Fee: $ 405. County of 1st Plaintiff: Oakland - County Where Action Arose: Oakland - County of 1st Defendant: Out of State. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- Reg. No. 1,927,329, #2 Exhibit B- Reg No. 3,173,354, #3 Exhibit C- Reg. No. 4,306,040, #4 Exhibit D - Pottery Barn Fabric Samples, #5 Exhibit E - Pottery Barn Website, #6 Exhibit F - AOL News Article, #7 Exhibit G - Yahoo! Lifestyle Article, #8 Exhibit H - Crypton Marketing Sheet, #9 Exhibit I - July 18, 2024 Letter to King) (Jakubowski, Matthew)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Crypton LLC v. Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Crypton LLC
Represented By: Matthew M. Jakubowski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
Represented By: Paul Alexander Bost
Represented By: Jill M. Pietrini
Represented By: Brian D. Wassom
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?