Booth v. Washington et al
| Earl D. Booth |
| Heidi Washington and Scott Fink |
| 4:2022cv10166 |
| January 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Curtis Ivy |
| Matthew F Leitman |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1343 Violation of Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
MOTION to Dismiss by Scott Fink, Heidi Washington. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1: Employee Discipline) (Asbenson, Kendell)
|
|
Filing 11
RESPONSE to #6 Emergency MOTION for Preliminary Injunction regarding Social Media Policy (Prompt Action Requested) filed by Scott Fink, Heidi Washington. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit 1: Use of Social Media Policy, #3 Exhibit 2: Employee Discipline, #4 Exhibit 3: Internal Affairs, #5 Exhibit 4: Mission Statement) (Asbenson, Kendell)
|
|
Filing 10
SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF re #6 Emergency MOTION for Preliminary Injunction regarding Social Media Policy (Prompt Action Requested) filed by Earl D. Booth. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Social Media Policy) (Ellison, Philip)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE of Appearance by Kendell S. Asbenson on behalf of Scott Fink, Heidi Washington. (Asbenson, Kendell)
|
|
Minute Entry for virtual proceedings before District Judge Matthew F. Leitman: Status Conference held on 2/1/2022. Plaintiff to submit supplemental brief by no later than February 11, 2022. Defendants to file response to Plaintiffs motion for preliminary injunction and supplemental brief by no later than March 7, 2022. (Court Reporter: Rob Smith) (HRya)
|
|
Filing 9
EXHIBITS in support of #6 Emergency motion for preliminary injunction by Earl D. Booth (filed in the traditional manner) (DPer)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE TO APPEAR BY VIDEO CONFERENCE: Status Conference set for 2/1/2022 at 1:00 PM before District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HRya)
|
|
Filing 6
Emergency MOTION for Preliminary Injunction regarding Social Media Policy (Prompt Action Requested) by Earl D. Booth. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A - Social Media Policy, #3 Exhibit B - Booth Declaration) (Ellison, Philip)
|
|
TEXT-ONLY ORDER Granting #5 Ex Parte MOTION for Order to File Exhibit in the Traditional Manner filed by Earl D. Booth. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HRya)
|
|
Filing 5
Ex Parte MOTION for Order to File Exhibit in the Traditional Manner by Earl D. Booth. (Ellison, Philip)
|
|
Filing 4
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Scott Fink waiver sent on 1/26/2022, answer due 3/28/2022; Heidi Washington waiver sent on 1/26/2022, answer due 3/28/2022. (Ellison, Philip)
|
|
Filing 3
SUMMONS Issued for *Scott Fink* (DPer)
|
|
Filing 2
SUMMONS Issued for *Heidi Washington* (DPer)
|
|
A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (DPer)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief filed by Earl D. Booth against Scott Fink, Heidi Washington. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-8770377 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: Jackson - County Where Action Arose: Jackson - County of 1st Defendant: Unknown. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Social Media Policy) (Ellison, Philip)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
