Cases 1 - 10 of 19
FINK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv10639
Plaintiff:
ERIC SCOTT FINK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Booth v. Fink et al
as 1:2023cv00758
Plaintiff:
Earl D. Booth
Defendant:
Scott Fink and Sean Dush
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Booth v. Fink et al
as 2:2023cv11629
Plaintiff:
Earl D. Booth
Defendant:
Scott Fink and Sean Dush
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Earl Booth v. Heidi Washington, et al
as 22-2082
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EARL D. BOOTH
Defendant / Appellee:
HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, in her official capacity and SCOTT FINK, in his official capacity
Booth v. Washington et al
as 4:2022cv10166
Plaintiff:
Earl D. Booth
Defendant:
Heidi Washington and Scott Fink
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Robert Scott v. Marcus McClung
as 20-6284
Defendant / Appellee:
VIRGINIA STATE POLICE, DELEGATE TERRY GENE KILGORE, SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA REGIONAL JAIL AUTHORITY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT BRADLEY SCOTT
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2019cv03004
Plaintiff:
CAROL DANKS, KEVIN A CLAFTON, COLT BOWIE CAUMUNE and others
Defendant:
MOHAMMD JAVAD ZARIF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Scott v. Mcclung et al
as 7:2019cv00570
Defendant:
Judge Hines, Boyd, Judge Hamilton and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Bradley Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abrons v. Nicholas Financial, Inc. et al
as 8:2014cv00583
Plaintiff:
Richard Abrons
Defendant:
Nicholas Financial, Inc., Peter L. Vosotas, Ralph T. Finenbrink and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078
Biver v. Nicholas Financial, Inc. et al
as 8:2014cv00250
Plaintiff:
Marvin Biver
Defendant:
Nicholas Financial, Inc. , Peter L. Vosotas , Ralph T. Finkenbrink and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
