Beck v. Ford Motor Company
| Steven Beck, David Braden, Mark Willard, Matthew Wilson, Brenda L. Rhodes, Stephen T. Rhodes, Mark Anderson, Greg Duenes, Michael Gneckow, John Stowers, Gail Gneckow, Douglas Holicz, Everett Sylvester Wilson III, Ryan Robbins, John Schabinger, Richard Powell, Sarah Ellers, Edward Blaine Schabinger, William Brock, John Koblasz, Catherine Gosser, Jesse Porter, Brendan Lawless, Justin Sager, Donald Marshall, Jonathan Taylor, Curtis Bright, William Griffitt, Ivan Tellez, Kevin Thomas, Ryan Scott, Ryan Katch, Dwaine Stutler Jr. and Desmond Rains |
| Ford Motor Company |
| 4:2022cv12079 |
| September 2, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| David R. Grand |
| F Kay Behm |
| Paul D Borman |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 40 RE-NOTICE OF REMOTE HEARING on #29 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Second Consolidated Class Action Complaintand #31 MOTION to Appoint Counsel Plaintiffs' Motion for Appointment of Proposed Leadership Structure. Motion Hearing RESET for 1/24/2024 at 2:00 PM before District Judge F. Kay Behm. *VIDEO CONFERENCE LINK WILL BE EMAILED TO THE PARTIES* |Remote Access Phone Number: 669 254 5252 and Meeting ID: 161 400 6364| (KMac) |
| Filing 39 RE-NOTICE OF VIDEO CONFERENCE HEARING on #29 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Second Consolidated Class Action Complaint AND #31 MOTION to Appoint Counsel Plaintiffs' Motion for Appointment of Proposed Leadership Structure. Motion Hearings RESET for 11/29/2023 at 2:00 PM before District Judge F. Kay Behm. |Zoom Webinar Information: https://www.zoomgov.com/j/1614006364?pwd=OTBoQUVNZ3Bqd3RTcmFNa0RhdExCZz09 Passcode: 548440 Or One tap mobile: +16692545252,,1614006364# US (San Jose) +16468287666,,1614006364# US (New York)| (KMac) |
| Filing 38 NOTICE OF VIDEO CONFERENCE HEARING on #31 MOTION to Appoint Counsel Plaintiffs' Motion for Appointment of Proposed Leadership Structure. Motion Hearing set for 12/6/2023 10:00 AM before District Judge F. Kay Behm *THIS MOTION WILL BE HEARD AT THE SAME TIME AS ECF NO. 29* |Zoom Webinar Information:. https://www.zoomgov.com/j/1614006364?pwd=OTBoQUVNZ3Bqd3RTcmFNa0RhdExCZz09 Passcode: 548440 Or One tap mobile: +16692545252,,1614006364# US (San Jose) +16468287666,,1614006364# US (New York)| (MacKay, K) |
| Filing 37 REPLY to Response re #29 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Second Consolidated Class Action Complaint filed by Ford Motor Company. (Linkous, Derek) |
| Filing 36 RESPONSE to #29 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Second Consolidated Class Action Complaint filed by Mark Anderson, Steven Beck, David Braden, Curtis Bright, William Brock, Greg Duenes, Sarah Ellers, Gail Gneckow, Michael Gneckow, Catherine Gosser, William Griffitt, Douglas Holicz, Ryan Katch, John Koblasz, Brendan Lawless, Donald Marshall, Jesse Porter, Richard Powell, Desmond Rains, Brenda L. Rhodes, Stephen T. Rhodes, Ryan Robbins, Justin Sager, Edward Blaine Schabinger, John Schabinger. (Berman, Steve) |
| Filing 35 REPLY to Response re #31 MOTION to Appoint Counsel Plaintiffs' Motion for Appointment of Proposed Leadership Structure filed by Mark Anderson, Steven Beck, David Braden, Curtis Bright, William Brock, Greg Duenes, Sarah Ellers. (Berman, Steve) |
| Filing 34 RESPONSE to #31 MOTION to Appoint Counsel Plaintiffs' Motion for Appointment of Proposed Leadership Structure filed by Ford Motor Company. (Linkous, Derek) |
| Filing 33 NOTICE OF VIDEO CONFERENCE HEARING on #29 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Second Consolidated Class Action Complaint. Motion Hearing RESET for 12/6/2023 10:00 AM before District Judge F. Kay Behm |Zoom Webinar Information: https://www.zoomgov.com/j/1614006364?pwd=OTBoQUVNZ3Bqd3RTcmFNa0RhdExCZz09 Passcode: 548440 Or One tap mobile : +16692545252,,1614006364# US (San Jose) +16468287666,,1614006364# US (New York)| (THal) |
| Filing 32 NOTICE OF VIDEO CONFERENCE HEARING on #29 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Second Consolidated Class Action Complaint. Motion Hearing set for 10/18/2023 10:00 AM before District Judge F. Kay Behm |Zoom Webinar Information: https://www.zoomgov.com/j/1614006364?pwd=OTBoQUVNZ3Bqd3RTcmFNa0RhdExCZz09 Passcode: 548440 Or One tap mobile : +16692545252,,1614006364# US (San Jose) +16468287666,,1614006364# US (New York)| (THal) |
| Filing 31 MOTION to Appoint Counsel Plaintiffs' Motion for Appointment of Proposed Leadership Structure by Mark Anderson, Steven Beck, David Braden, Curtis Bright, William Brock, Greg Duenes, Sarah Ellers, Gail Gneckow, Michael Gneckow, Catherine Gosser, William Griffitt, Douglas Holicz, Ryan Katch, John Koblasz, Brendan Lawless, Donald Marshall, Jesse Porter, Richard Powell, Desmond Rains, Brenda L. Rhodes, Ryan Robbins, Justin Sager, Edward Blaine Schabinger, John Schabinger, Ryan Scott, John Stowers, Dwaine Stutler Jr., Jonathan Taylor, Ivan Tellez, Kevin Thomas, Mark Willard, Matthew Wilson, Everett Sylvester Wilson III. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit 1 - Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP Firm Resume, #3 Exhibit 2 - The Miller Law Firm, P.C. Resume, #4 Exhibit 3 - Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP Firm Resume, #5 Exhibit 4 - Keller Rohrback L.L.P. Firm Resume, #6 Exhibit 5 - Fegan Scott LLC Firm Resume, #7 Exhibit 6 - Unpublished Authorities) (Berman, Steve) |
Filing 30
STIPULATED ORDER increasing page limitations. Signed by District Judge F. Kay Behm. (DPer)
|
| Filing 29 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Second Consolidated Class Action Complaint by Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2 - Doolin Judgment, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 3 - Johnson Judgment, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 4 - Holden Johnson, #5 Exhibit Exhibit 5 - Hill Sanctions Order, #6 Exhibit Exhibit 6 - Appendix A - Statute of Limitations Chart) (Linkous, Derek) |
| Filing 28 NOTICE of Appearance by Shelby Smith on behalf of All Plaintiffs. (Smith, Shelby) |
| Filing 27 NOTICE of Appearance by Joseph Kingerski on behalf of All Plaintiffs. (Kingerski, Joseph) |
|
Filing 26
ORDER Terminating #18 Motion for More Definite Statement as Moot. Signed by District Judge F. Kay Behm. (THal)
|
| Filing 25 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand Second Consolidated Class Action Complaint filed by Catherine Gosser, Gail Gneckow, John Stowers, Richard Powell, William Griffitt, Steven Beck, John Koblasz, Douglas Holicz, Ryan Scott, Curtis Bright, Jonathan Taylor, Sarah Ellers, Everett Sylvester Wilson III, Edward Blaine Schabinger, Jesse Porter, John Schabinger, Justin Sager, Ivan Tellez, Greg Duenes, David Braden, Brendan Lawless, Stephen T. Rhodes, Kevin Thomas, Mark Willard, Donald Marshall, Michael Gneckow, Brenda L. Rhodes, William Brock, Ryan Robbins, Mark Anderson, Ryan Katch, Dwaine Stutler Jr., Desmond Rains against Ford Motor Company. NEW PARTIES ADDED. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit 1 - Byron Bloch, Protecting Occupants in Rollover Crashes: Case Examples and Latest Technologies, #3 Exhibit 2 - Welday v. Ford Motor Co., No. 19CV33212 (Multnomah Cir. Ct.), Plaintiffs Motion for Leave To File Third Amended Complaint To Add Punitive Damages Claims Against Defendant Ford Motor Company, #4 Exhibit 3 - Monash University, Rollover Crash Study Vehicle design and occupant injuries (appendix omitted), #5 Exhibit 4 - Ford Forums, U.S.: Danger Overhead: Crushed Roofs, Thousands Killed, hurt as auto roofs collapse, #6 Exhibit 5 - Taylor v. Ford Motor Co., No. 06-cv-00069 (D. Me.), Dkt. No. 86, #7 Exhibit 6 - Hill v. Ford Motor Co., No. 16 C 04179-2 (Sept. 22, 2017), Plaintiffs Response to Ford Motor Companys Three Motions for Partial Summary Judgment, #8 Exhibit 7 - August 22, 2022 Wall Street Journal article titled Roof Strength on Older Ford Trucks Called Into Question by $1.7 Billion Jury Verdict, #9 Exhibit 8 - Motorbiscuit.com article titled What You Should Know About the Ford Super Duty Death Wobble, #10 Exhibit 9 - Ford Authority, FORD SUPER DUTY LINEUP IS AN EXTREMELY VALUABLE PROFIT GENERATOR, May 6, 2022, #11 Exhibit 10 - Macrotrends, Ford Motor Gross Profit 2010-2022, #12 Exhibit 11 - PickupTrucks.com, Ford Super Duty Solidifies Reign as King of Heavy-Duty Truck Sales, Nov. 15, 2010, #13 Exhibit 12 - MY 1999 Ford SuperDuty brochure, #14 Exhibit 13 - MY 2009 Ford SuperDuty brochure, #15 Exhibit 14 - MY 2010 Ford SuperDuty brochure, #16 Exhibit 15 - MY 2011 Ford SuperDuty brochure, #17 Exhibit 16 - MY 2012 Ford SuperDuty brochure, #18 Exhibit 17 - MY 2013 Ford SuperDuty brochure, #19 Exhibit 18 - MY 2014 Ford SuperDuty brochure, #20 Exhibit 19 - 2013 Ford F-350, Motortrend.com, #21 Exhibit 20 - 2016 Ford F-350, Motortrend.com, #22 Exhibit 21 - Taylor v. Ford Motor Co., No. 06-cv-00069 (D. Me.), Dkt. No. 97, #23 Exhibit 22 - Gibson v. Ford Motor Co., No. 1:06-cv-01237 (N.D. Ga.), Dkt. No. 177-1, #24 Exhibit 23 - Ott v. Ford Motor Co., No. 03-cv-00101 (W.D. Ky.), Dkt. No. 76-2, #25 Exhibit 24 - August 25, 2022 Wall Street Journal article titled Ford Trucks Highlighted in $1.7 Billion Verdict Werent Subject to Tougher Safety Rules, #26 Exhibit 25 - 1964 Ford Country Squire station wagon advertisement, #27 Exhibit 26 - Article titled Industry Concealment of Tests Undermined Development of Meaningful Rollover Crash Roof Crush Resistance Standard in 1971, #28 Exhibit 27 - Article regarding Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, #29 Exhibit 28 - Article titled 1971 Roof Strength Standard: 33-Year Old Standard Does Not Provide Basic Rollover Crashworthiness Protections, #30 Exhibit 29 - May 14, 2005 N.Y.T. article titled Not the Top of the Safety Priorities, #31 Exhibit 30 - This is Volvo, Volvo, #32 Exhibit 31 - CNN, Memos tell of Ford-Volvo safety dispute, May 16, 2005, #33 Exhibit 32 - Vehicle Size and Weight, Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, Highway Loss Data Institute, July 2022, #34 Exhibit 33 - Body Nomenclature, Automotive Design in the Digital Age, #35 Exhibit 34 - NHTSA, Evaluation of FMVSS No. 216a, Roof Crush Resistance, Upgraded Standard, #36 Exhibit 35 - Hannah Albarazi, Ford's $1.7B Trial Loss Puts Spotlight On Hush Deals, Ga. Law, Law360 (Aug. 26, 2022)) (Berman, Steve) |
| Filing 24 Notice to Parties Regarding Consolidated Case: Order of consolidation entered on *3/28/23*. Designated lead case number is *22-12079*. (SSch) |
|
Filing 23
Stipulated ORDER Consolidating Cases. Signed by District Judge F. Kay Behm. (SSch)
|
| Filing 22 NOTICE OF VIDEO CONFERENCE HEARING on #18 MOTION for More Definite Statement Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(e). Motion Hearing set for 7/19/2023 at 2:00 PM before District Judge F. Kay Behm |Zoom Webinar Information: https://www.zoomgov.com/j/1614670586?pwd=bmFPMUZvbW9xZklvendkTGZuYjQrUT09 Passcode: 927791 Or One tap mobile : US: +16692545252,,1614670586# or +16468287666,,1614670586#| (RLou) |
|
Filing 21
STIPULATED ORDER to Accept Ford Motor Company's Reply Brief Out of Time. Signed by District Judge F. Kay Behm. (RLou)
|
| Filing 20 REPLY to Response re #18 MOTION for More Definite Statement Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(e) filed by Ford Motor Company. (Linkous, Derek) |
| Text-Only Order of reassignment from District Judge Paul D. Borman to District Judge F. Kay Behm pursuant to Administrative Order 23-AO-003. (SSch) |
| Filing 19 RESPONSE to #18 MOTION for More Definite Statement Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(e) filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Unpublished Cases) (Berman, Steve) |
| Filing 18 MOTION for More Definite Statement Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(e) by Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Unpublished Cases) (Linkous, Derek) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Appearance by Perry W. Miles, IV on behalf of Ford Motor Company. (Miles, Perry) |
| Filing 16 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand Consolidated Class Action Complaint filed by All Plaintiffs against Ford Motor Company. NEW PARTIES ADDED. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit 1 - Byron Bloch, Protecting Occupants in Rollover Crashes: Case Examples and Latest Technologies, #3 Exhibit 2 - Welday v. Ford Motor Co., No. 19CV33212 (Multnomah Cir. Ct.), Plaintiffs Motion for Leave To File Third Amended Complaint To Add Punitive Damages Claims Against Defendant Ford Motor Company, #4 Exhibit 3 - Monash University, Rollover Crash Study Vehicle design and occupant injuries (appendix omitted), #5 Exhibit 4 - Ford Forums, U.S.: Danger Overhead: Crushed Roofs, Thousands Killed, hurt as auto roofs collapse, #6 Exhibit 5 - Taylor v. Ford Motor Co., No. 06-cv-00069 (D. Me.), Dkt. No. 86, #7 Exhibit 6 - Hill v. Ford Motor Co., No. 16 C 04179-2 (Sept. 22, 2017), Plaintiffs Response to Ford Motor Companys Three Motions for Partial Summary Judgment, #8 Exhibit 7 - August 22, 2022 Wall Street Journal article titled Roof Strength on Older Ford Trucks Called Into Question by $1.7 Billion Jury Verdict, #9 Exhibit 8 - Motorbiscuit.com article titled What You Should Know About the Ford Super Duty Death Wobble, #10 Exhibit 9 - Ford Authority, FORD SUPER DUTY LINEUP IS AN EXTREMELY VALUABLE PROFIT GENERATOR, May 6, 2022, #11 Exhibit 10 - Macrotrends, Ford Motor Gross Profit 2010-2022, #12 Exhibit 11 - PickupTrucks.com, Ford Super Duty Solidifies Reign as King of Heavy-Duty Truck Sales, Nov. 15, 2010, #13 Exhibit 12 - MY 1999 Ford SuperDuty brochure, #14 Exhibit 13 - MY 2009 Ford SuperDuty brochure, #15 Exhibit 14 - MY 2010 Ford SuperDuty brochure, #16 Exhibit 15 - MY 2011 Ford SuperDuty brochure, #17 Exhibit 16 - MY 2012 Ford SuperDuty brochure, #18 Exhibit 17 - MY 2013 Ford SuperDuty brochure, #19 Exhibit 18 - MY 2014 Ford SuperDuty brochure, #20 Exhibit 19 - 2013 Ford F-350, Motortrend.com, #21 Exhibit 20 - 2016 Ford F-350, Motortrend.com, #22 Exhibit 21 - Taylor v. Ford Motor Co., No. 06-cv-00069 (D. Me.), Dkt. No. 97, #23 Exhibit 22 - Gibson v. Ford Motor Co., No. 1:06-cv-01237 (N.D. Ga.), Dkt. No. 177-1, #24 Exhibit 23 - Ott v. Ford Motor Co., No. 03-cv-00101 (W.D. Ky.), Dkt. No. 76-2, #25 Exhibit 24 - August 25, 2022 Wall Street Journal article titled Ford Trucks Highlighted in $1.7 Billion Verdict Werent Subject to Tougher Safety Rules, #26 Exhibit 25 - 1964 Ford Country Squire station wagon advertisement, #27 Exhibit 26 - Article titled Industry Concealment of Tests Undermined Development of Meaningful Rollover Crash Roof Crush Resistance Standard in 1971, #28 Exhibit 27 - Article regarding Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, #29 Exhibit 28 - Article titled 1971 Roof Strength Standard: 33-Year Old Standard Does Not Provide Basic Rollover Crashworthiness Protections, #30 Exhibit 29 - May 14, 2005 N.Y.T. article titled Not the Top of the Safety Priorities, #31 Exhibit 30 - This is Volvo, Volvo, #32 Exhibit 31 - CNN, Memos tell of Ford-Volvo safety dispute, May 16, 2005, #33 Exhibit 32 - Vehicle Size and Weight, Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, Highway Loss Data Institute, July 2022) (Berman, Steve) |
| Filing 15 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Dennis A. Lienhardt appearing on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Lienhardt, Dennis) |
| Filing 14 Notice to Parties Regarding Consolidated Case: Order of consolidation entered on *10/12/22*. Designated lead case number is *22-12079*. (SSch) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER and Agreed upon Stipulation (Modified) for Consolidation of these related actions and Setting Schedule for the Filing of a Consolidated Complaint and Responsive Pleading. Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (SSch)
|
| Filing 12 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Steven Beck, David Braden, Mark Willard, Matthew Wilson against Ford Motor Company. NEW PARTIES ADDED. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit 1 - August 22, 2022 Wall Street Journal article titled Roof Strength on Older Ford Trucks Called Into Question by $1.7 Billion Jury Verdict, #3 Exhibit 2 - Motorbiscuit.com article titled What You Should Know About the Ford Super Duty Death Wobble, #4 Exhibit 3 - MY 2013 Ford SuperDuty brochure, #5 Exhibit 4 - MY 2009 Ford SuperDuty brochure, #6 Exhibit 5 - MY 2011 Ford SuperDuty brochure, #7 Exhibit 6 - 2013 Ford F-350, Motortrend.com, #8 Exhibit 7 - 2016 Ford F-350, Motortrend.com, #9 Exhibit 8 - Ott v. Ford Motor Co., No. 03-cv-00101 (W.D. Ky.), Dkt. No. 76-2, #10 Exhibit 9 - August 25, 2022 Wall Street Journal article, #11 Exhibit 10 - Taylor v. Ford Motor Co., No. 06-cv-00069 (D. Me.), Dkt. No. 97, #12 Exhibit 11 - Taylor v. Ford Motor Co., No. 06-cv-00069 (D. Me.), Dkt. No. 86, #13 Exhibit 12 - Gibson v. Ford Motor Co., No. 1:06-cv-01237 (N.D. Ga.), Dkt. No. 177-1, #14 Exhibit 13 - Byron Bloch, Protecting Occupants in Rollover Crashes: Case Examples and Latest Technologies, #15 Exhibit 14 - 1964 Ford Country Squire station wagon advertisement, #16 Exhibit 15 - Ford Forums, U.S.: Danger Overhead: Crushed Roofs, Thousands Killed, hurt as auto roofs collapse, #17 Exhibit 16 - Article titled Industry Concealment of Tests Undermined Development of Meaningful Rollover Crash Roof Crush Resistance Standard in 1971, #18 Exhibit 17 - Article regarding Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, #19 Exhibit 18 - Monash University study titled Rollover Crash Study Vehicle design and occupant injuries, #20 Exhibit 19 - Article titled 1971 Roof Strength Standard: 33-Year Old Standard Does Not Provide Basic Rollover Crashworthiness Protections, #21 Exhibit 20 - May 14, 2005 N.Y.T. article titled Not the Top of the Safety Priorities) (Berman, Steve) |
| Filing 11 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Ford Motor Company (Linkous, Derek) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Derek J. Linkous on behalf of Ford Motor Company. (Linkous, Derek) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Stephanie A. Douglas on behalf of Ford Motor Company. (Douglas, Stephanie) |
|
Filing 8
STIPULATED ORDER ON EXTENSION OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE. Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (DTof)
|
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Ford Motor Company served on 9/8/2022, answer due 9/29/2022. (Berman, Steve) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Issued for *Ford Motor Company* (LGra) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas Eric Loeser on behalf of Steven Beck. (Loeser, Thomas) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Steve W. Berman on behalf of Steven Beck. (Berman, Steve) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Sharon S. Almonrode appearing on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Almonrode, Sharon) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by E. Powell Miller on behalf of All Plaintiffs. (Miller, E.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Class Action Complaint filed by Steven Beck against Ford Motor Company with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9041046 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: San Luis Obispo - California - County Where Action Arose: Detroit - County of 1st Defendant: Wayne. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit 1 - Wall Street Journal Roof Strength on Older Ford Trucks Called Into Question by $1.7 Billion Jury Verdict, #3 Exhibit 2 - Motorbiscuit.com What You Should Know About the Ford Super Duty Death Wobble, #4 Exhibit 3 - MY 2013 Ford SuperDuty brochure, #5 Exhibit 4 - MY 2009 Ford SuperDuty brochure, #6 Exhibit 5 - MY 2011 Ford SuperDuty brochure, #7 Exhibit 6 - 2013 Ford F-350, Motortrend.com, #8 Exhibit 7 - 2016 Ford F-350, Motortend.com, #9 Exhibit 8 - Ott v. Ford Motor Co., No. 4:03-cv-00101 (W.D. Ky.), Dkt. No. 76-2, #10 Exhibit 9 - Wall Street Journal Ford Trucks Highlighted in $1.7 Billion Verdict Werent Subject to Tougher Safety Rules, #11 Exhibit 10 - Ford Forums - U.S.: Danger Overhead: Crushed Roofs, Thousands Killed, hurt as auto roofs collapse, #12 Exhibit 11 - Taylor v. Ford Motor Co., No. 06-69-B-W (D. Me.), Dkt. No. 97) (Berman, Steve) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
