Cases 1 - 10 of 69
Taylor v. Josephs, et al.
as 23-4112
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JONATHAN TAYLOR
Defendant / Appellee:
TIFFANY JOSEPHS, WRIGHT NOEL, THOMAS STOCKARD and others
Taylor v. Gilliam et al
as 4:2023cv00988
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Taylor, Robert Howard, Cedric Armond Mitchell and others
Defendant:
Wade Gilliam, Jones, Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell et al v. Gilliam et al
as 5:2023cv05178
Plaintiff:
Cedric Armond Mitchell, Michael Denson, Donald Shackleford and others
Defendant:
Captain Wade Gilliam, Sergeant Jones, Deputy Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv26613
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN TAYLOR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Taylor v. Josephs et al
as 2:2023cv01459
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Taylor
Defendant:
Tiffany Josephs, Wright Noel, Thomas Stockard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taylor v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv02575
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Taylor
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Meraz v. Payne et al
as 2:2023cv00181
Plaintiff:
Jerome Meraz
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Christopher Budnik, Brandon Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seay, et al. v. Countach, LLC
as 3:2023cv00401
Plaintiff:
Betty Jordan Seay, Gary B. Patterson, Jonathan Taylor and others
Defendant:
Countach, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01753
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Roberts v. Barnwell et al
as 6:2023cv06243
Plaintiff:
Chavana Roberts
Defendant:
Ruth Barnwell, Christopher McClary, Q'asia Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
