Banisad et al v. US Department of State et al
| Merrick Garland, United States Department of State, Anthony Blinken, Ian Brownlee, US Department of Homeland Security, Secretary of, US Department of Homeland Security, US National Visa Center, Director of, US Attorney General, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Director of, US Department of State, US Secretary of State and US Consular Affairs, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of |
| ALI BANISAD, JAAFAR SAEED MOHAMMED BANI SAAD and IBTISAM ABDULHAUSSA DIKLA |
| ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Conn Schrader and Christopher Wray |
| 4:2023cv12421 |
| September 25, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Kimberly G Altman |
| Shalina D Kumar |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
STIPULATION AND ORDER For Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint. Responsive pleading due by 2/1/2024. Signed by District Judge Shalina D. Kumar. (THal)
|
| Filing 6 [DOCKETING ERROR - ENTERED ON WRONG CASE]NOTICE of Correction re Notice of Error. (SSch) Modified on 11/13/2023 (SSch). |
| NOTICE of Error directed to: Benjamin A. Anchill re #5 Notice of Appearance. Docket entry was made on the wrong case. Document was stricken and must be refiled correctly. [No Image Associated with this docket entry] (SSch) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Benjamin A. Anchill on behalf of All Defendants. (Anchill, Benjamin) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. U.S. Attorney on behalf of All Defendants. (Brikho, Sara) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued for * All Defendants and United States Attorney * (DPer) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT filed by All Plaintiffs against All Defendants. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9503888 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: OAKLAND - County Where Action Arose: OAKLAND - County of 1st Defendant: USA. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Brikho, Sara) |
| A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (DPer) |
| Filing 1 THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT filed by All Plaintiffs against All Defendants (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit 1. I-797 I-130 Petition of Alien Relative Receipt., #3 Exhibit 2. National Visa Center Immigration Visa Interview Appointment and Interview Result., #4 Exhibit 3. Ibtisam Abdulhussa Diklas Interview Notice, Perment Residence Card, and Iraqi Passport Biographical Page., #5 Exhibit 4.Inquiry List., #6 Exhibit 5. Medical Report for JAAFAR SAEED MOHAMMED SALEH BANI SAAD and Ibtisam Abdulhussa Dikla., #7 Exhibit 6. ALI BANISADs Passport Biographical page, Drivers License, Citizenship Certificate, and Birth Certificate., #8 Exhibit 7. JAAFAR SAEED MOHAMMED SALEH BANI SAADs Passport Biographical page and Birth Certificate., #9 Exhibit 8. JAAFAR SAEED MOHAMMED SALEH BANI SAAD and IBTISAM ABDULHAUSSA DIKLA Marriage Certificate.) (Brikho, Sara) [ATTORNEY TO REFILE COMPLAINT ONLY USING THE CORRECT EVENT]. Modified on 9/26/2023 (SSch). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
