Stevens #155008 v. Hutchinson et al
| James M. Stevens #155008 |
| Craig Hutchinson, Corizon, Daniel H. Heyns, Unknown Party #1, Gail Burke and Unknown Party #2 |
| 1:2013cv00918 |
| August 22, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Southern Division (1) Office |
| Ionia |
| Robert Holmes Bell |
| Joseph G. Scoville |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
223
OPINION AND ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 213 ; Defendant's motion for summary judgment 200 is GRANTED; Plaintiff's motion for discovery 209 is DENIED; Judgment to issue; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, clb)
|
|
Filing
148
OPINION AND ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING with two exceptions REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 140 ; MDOC Defendants' motion to dismiss and/or for summary judgment 117 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; Corizon Defendants' motion for summary judgment 132 as corrected by 133 is GRANTED; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, clb)
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 14 , denying plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction 11 ; signed by Judge Robert Holmes Bell (Judge Robert Holmes Bell, kcb)
|
|
Filing
4
OPINION ; signed by Judge Robert Holmes Bell (Judge Robert Holmes Bell, kcb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
