Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Ryan v. State of Michigan et al
as 2:2022cv13002
Plaintiff:
Sean Michael Ryan
Defendant:
State of Michigan, Michigan Department of Corrections, Corizon Healthcare, Inc. and others
James Stevens v. Craig Hutchinson, et al
as 19-2272
Defendant / Appellee:
DANIEL H. HEYNS, Director of Michigan Department of Corrections, HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, UNKNOWN PARTY #1, Medical Director of the Michigan Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES M. STEVENS
Haag #667757 v. Washington et al
as 1:2017cv00311
Plaintiff:
Brian Haag #667757
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, Corizon Health Services , Gail Burke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ryan v. Carson City Correctional Facility et al
as 2:2017cv10562
Plaintiff:
Sean Michael Ryan
Defendant:
Carson City Correctional Facility, FNU Holmes, FNU Spurlling and others
Hoffman #181813 v. Alfrey et al
as 1:2015cv01194
Plaintiff:
Robert Hoffman #181813
Defendant:
Joan Alfrey, J. Leland, Luke Rexford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kevin Briggs v. Gail Burke, et al
as 15-2282
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN DEVON BRIGGS
Defendant - Appellee:
GAIL BURKE, ANN KARP, LISA BERG and others
Drain #439253 v. Burke et al
as 1:2013cv01326
Plaintiff:
Lavagas Drain #439253
Defendant:
Gail Burke, Dennis Behler, Lisa Wo Jciechowski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Briggs #447282 v. Burke et al
as 1:2013cv01160
Plaintiff:
Kevin Devon Briggs #447282
Defendant:
Gail Burke, Ann M. Karp, Lisa Berg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stevens #155008 v. Hutchinson et al
as 1:2013cv00918
Plaintiff:
James M. Stevens #155008
Defendant:
Craig Hutchinson, Corizon, Daniel H. Heyns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burks et al v. Troxel et al
as 1:2009cv00856
Plaintiff:
Reggie Bernard Burks, Sr. and Jacqueline Gail Burks
Defendant:
Todd Troxel and Petoskey, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
