Doe v. Whitmer et al
John Doe |
Gretchen Esther Whitmer and Joseph Gasper |
1:2019cv00422 |
June 1, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
Ellen S Carmody |
Janet T Neff |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 SUMMONS ISSUED as to defendants Joseph Gasper, Gretchen Esther Whitmer (mg) |
Filing 5 PROPOSED SUMMONS to be issued re #1 (Gibbons, Christopher) |
SUMMONS NOT ISSUED as to defendants Joseph Gasper, Gretchen Esther Whitmer (none provided) (mg) |
Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed Anonymously #2 be granted; objections to R&R due within 14 days; signed by Magistrate Judge Ellen S. Carmody (Magistrate Judge Ellen S. Carmody, cbh) |
Filing 3 NOTICE that this case has been assigned Janet T. Neff ; with NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY re filing fee (ns) |
FILING FEE PAID re #1 by plaintiff John Doe in the amount of $400, receipt number 0646-4451582 (Gibbons, Christopher) |
SUMMONS NOT ISSUED as to defendants Joseph Gasper, Gretchen Esther Whitmer ; filing fee due; none provided (ns) |
Filing 2 MOTION for protective order by plaintiff John Doe; (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Gibbons, Christopher) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against All Defendants filed by John Doe (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E) (Gibbons, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.