Castaneda et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
| Abel Castaneda Contreras and Cecilia Castaneda |
| United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Michael Paul, Donald Neufeld, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, Chad F. Wolf, Department of Homeland Security and United States Department of Homeland Security |
| 1:2020cv00377 |
| May 2, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Ray Kent |
| Janet T Neff |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS returned executed on All Defendants, US Attorney and US Attorney General; service upon defendant, All Defendants (Betzold, James) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to defendants Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, Department of Homeland Security, Donald Neufeld, Michael Paul, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Chad F. Wolf, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (ndj) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE that this case has been assigned Janet T. Neff (ndj) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Cecilia Castaneda, Abel Castaneda Contreras (Attachments: #1 Summons Proposed Summons) (Betzold, James) |
| FILING FEE PAID re #1 by plaintiffs Cecilia Castaneda, Abel Castaneda Contreras in the amount of $400, receipt number AMIWDC-5201190 (Betzold, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
