Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 598
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv02563
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Kasyjanski v. Allyene et al
as 1:2024cv02278
Plaintiff: Keith Edward Kasyjanski
Defendant: Jennifer Allyene, Kelly Lotnard, Nicole Chimenti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Roush et al v. Mead Johnson & Company, LLC. et al
as 1:2024cv02224
Plaintiff: Michael Paul Roush and Jessica Renee Sperry Roush
Defendant: Mead Johnson & Company, LLC. and Mead Johnson Nurtrition Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
v. Contreras et al
as 7:2024cv00028
Plaintiff: Michael Paul Contreras
Defendant: Director, TDCJ-CID, Brandon D. Dishman, Bryan D. Reitsma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Mynar
as 24-10130
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Michael Paul Mynar
Lindsey v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.
as 4:2024cv00082
Plaintiff: Michael Paul Lindsey
Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Railway Labor Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00877
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00878
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00097
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Michael Paul Barber v. Martin O Malley We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2024cv00021
Plaintiff: Michael Paul Barber
Defendant: Martin J. O Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?