Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 109
USA v. Mynar
as 24-10130
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Michael Paul Mynar
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00097
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
US v. Michael Puzey
as 23-6977
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: MICHAEL PAUL PUZEY, a/k/a Big Pete
Hart et al v. Citigroup Mortgage Home Trust 2019-E
as 1:2023cv11447
Plaintiff: Michael Paul Hart and Dorothy Hart Wilson
Defendant: Citigroup Mortgage Home Trust 2019-E
USA v. Michael Gianfrancesco
as 23-11294
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: MICHAEL PAUL GIANFRANCESCO
EAGAR v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00372
Plaintiff: MICHAEL PAUL EAGAR
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
US v. Michael Puzey
as 22-7070
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: MICHAEL PAUL PUZEY, a/k/a Big Pete
SINDT v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00774
Plaintiff: ZECHARIAH SINDT
Defendant: UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, U.S. EMBASSY IN PHNOM PENH, CAMBODIA and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration and Nationality Act
SAMOODY v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES et al
as 1:2022cv00702
Plaintiff: AHMADREZA SAMOODY
Defendant: UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, UR MENDOZA JADDOU and MICHAEL PAUL
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Raju v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 3:2022cv00156
Plaintiff: Sharon Raju
Defendant: United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Michael Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?