Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Fisherman v. Doe 1 et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00246
Defendant: Michael Paul, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff: Leonard James Fisherman, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
V. U. C., et al v. USCIS, et al
as 21-1778
Plaintiff / Appellant: V. U. C. and P. C. C.
Defendant / Appellee: U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, in official capacity as Secretary of Department of Homeland Security, TRACY RENAUD, in her official capacity as Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director of US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) and others
V.U.C. et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv10652
Defendant: United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Acting Associate Dir Connie Nolan, Dir. Neb. Serv. Ctr. William Connor and others
Plaintiff: P. C. C. and V. U. C.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv10335
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv12122
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv40189
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Schwartz et al v. Botanical Silk Accents Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv10664
Plaintiff: Ray Schwartz, Worldwide Concepts Services, Inc., Aavantage Marketing, Inc. and others
Defendant: Botanical Silk Accents Inc., Botanical Silk Direct and Michael Paul Dolbec
Trustee: The TJX Companies, Inc., J.C. Penney Corporation, J.C. Penney Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract Plaintiff

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?