Mathis v. Dept. of Justice Center
Evonna Mathis |
United States Marshal Service, Dept. of Justice Center and United States Attorney General |
1:2020cv00711 |
July 31, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
Sally J Berens |
Janet T Neff |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 LETTER from plaintiff Evonna Mathis regarding re-filing of cases; Response from Clerk and docket sheet mailed to plaintiff 9/22/20 (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1, #2 Response from Clerk) (ems) |
Filing 14 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that Plaintiff's first amended complaint be dismissed with prejudice and her motion to seal case #11 be denied as moot; further recommending the Court issue an order barring her from filing any future actions against the named Defendants in the referenced cases or alternatively bar Plaintiff from proceeding in forma pauperis in any future lawsuit she may file in this Court; objections to R&R due within 14 days; signed by Magistrate Judge Sally J. Berens (jal) |
Copy of Report and Recommendation, #14 sent via U.S. Mail to Evonna Mathis (ems) |
Filing 13 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by plaintiff Evonna Mathis re MOTION to SEAL CASE with certificate of service #11 (ems) |
Copy of Order Rejecting Pleading #12 with original documents sent via U.S. Mail to Evonna Mathis (tlbu) |
Filing 12 ORDER REJECTING Motion to Seal Case submitted by Evonna Mathis; signed by Magistrate Judge Sally J. Berens (Attachments: #1 Proposed Document) (jal) |
Filing 11 MOTION to SEAL CASE with certificate of service by plaintiff Evonna Mathis; (ems) |
Filing 10 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Dept. of Justice Center, United States Attorney General filed by Evonna Mathis (ems) |
Copy of Order to Proceed In Forma Pauperis #4 , Order on Motion to Amend/Correct #8 , Report and Recommendation (Screening) #6 , Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge #5 sent via U.S. Mail to Evonna Mathis due to recent change of address (ems) |
Filing 9 CHANGE OF ADDRESS for plaintiff Evonna Mathis to 1971 Beltline Ave. NE, Ste. 106, Box 157, Grand Rapids, MI 49525 (with proof of service) (ems) |
Filing 8 ORDER denying #7 plaintiff's motion to amend; signed by Magistrate Judge Sally J. Berens (cbh) |
Copy of Order on Motion to Amend/Correct #8 sent via U.S. Mail to Evonna Mathis (ems) |
Filing 7 MOTION to amend/correct #1 by plaintiff Evonna Mathis; (ems) |
Copy of Report and Recommendation (Screening) #6 sent via U.S. Mail to Evonna Mathis (ems) |
Filing 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that Plaintiff's claims be dismissed with prejudice; objections to R&R due within 14 days; signed by Magistrate Judge Sally J. Berens (jal) |
Filing 5 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Sally J. Berens; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, rmw) |
Filing 4 ORDER granting plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis; signed by Magistrate Judge Sally J. Berens (jal) |
Copy of Order to Proceed In Forma Pauperis #4 sent via U.S. Mail to Evonna Mathis (ems) |
Copy of Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge #5 sent via U.S. Mail to Evonna Mathis (ems) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of receipt of case (ems) |
Copy of Receipt of Case Notice #3 sent via U.S. Mail to Evonna Mathis (ems) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION TO PROCEED without prepayment of fees and affidavit (ems) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against United States Marshal Service filed by Evonna Mathis (ems) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.