Salami #879045 v. Rewerts et al
| Michael Salami #879045 |
| Randee Rewerts, Michigan Department of Corrections and Heidi Washington |
| 1:2020cv01246 |
| December 28, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Michigan |
| Phillip J Green |
| Janet T Neff |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER FOR PARTIAL DISMISSAL; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, clb)
|
|
Filing 4
OPINION; Order to issue; signed by Judge Janet T. Neff (Judge Janet T. Neff, clb)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS and FOR PAYMENT OF FILING FEE: plaintiff to pay an initial partial fee of $7.33 when funds are available; plaintiff to make interim payments until the full fee is paid; signed by Magistrate Judge Phillip J. Green (jkw)
|
| Copy of Order to Proceed IFP - Initial Fee Due When Funds Are Available - Prisoner, #3 sent via U.S. Mail to Michael Salami #879045 (ems) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION TO PROCEED without prepayment of fees and affidavit (Attachments: #1 Financial Documents) (ems) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with magistrate referral and jury demand against Michigan Department of Corrections, Randee Rewerts, Heidi Washington filed by Michael Salami #879045 (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1) (ems) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
