Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Salami #879045 v. Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea
as 1:2024cv00360
Plaintiff:
Michael Salami #879045
Defendant:
Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Salami #879045 v. Washington et al
as 1:2022cv00174
Plaintiff:
Michael Salami #879045
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, Patricia Schmidt, Unknown Party #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Salami #879045 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv01247
Defendant:
Gender Dysphoria Recomendation Committee and Michigan Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Michael Salami #879045
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salami #879045 v. Rewerts et al
as 1:2020cv01246
Defendant:
Randee Rewerts, Michigan Department of Corrections and Heidi Washington
Plaintiff:
Michael Salami #879045
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salami #879045 et al v. Barton et al
as 1:2020cv01245
Plaintiff:
Michael Salami #879045, Tishinea Nikobi and Delvin Collier #870843
Defendant:
John Henry Beecher, Unknown Barton and Khris Nevins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salami #879045 v. Comerica Bank
as 1:2020cv01118
Plaintiff:
Michael Salami #879045
Defendant:
Comerica Bank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salami #879045 v. Niemiec et al
as 1:2020cv01100
Defendant:
J. Niemiec, Khris Nevins and John H. Beecher
Plaintiff:
Michael Salami #879045
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salami #879045 v. Sperling et al
as 1:2020cv00541
Defendant:
Unknown Part(y)(ies) #1, Kyle Sperling and Corizon Healthcare, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael Salami #879045
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salami #879045 v. Corizon Healthcare, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00313
Defendant:
Kyle Sperling and Corizon Healthcare, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael Salami #879045
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salami #879045 v. Washington et al
as 1:2020cv00107
Defendant:
R. Rewerts, J. Winger, L. Beecher and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Salami #879045
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
