Salem v. Larkin et al
Plaintiff: MAURICE JAMES SALEM
Defendant: JEROME LARKIN, ILLINOIS ATTORNEY REGISTRATION) AND DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION and Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission
Case Number: 2:2020cv00220
Filed: October 26, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Paul L Maloney
Referring Judge: Maarten Vermaat
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER denying #1 motion for leave to file complaint in the WDMI and dismissing case; denying as moot #6 motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis; signed by District Judge Paul L. Maloney (Judge Paul L. Maloney, acr)
October 28, 2020 Filing 6 MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis by plaintiff Maurice James Salem; (Salem, Maurice)
October 28, 2020 Filing 5 UNSIGNED MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis by plaintiff Maurice James Salem; (Salem, Maurice) Modified text on 10/28/2020 (mlc).
October 28, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE to attorney Maurice J. Salem regarding recent filing #1 (mlc)
October 28, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE that this case has been assigned Paul L. Maloney ; with NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY re filing fee (mlc)
October 26, 2020 Filing 2 UNSIGNED APPLICATION TO PROCEED without prepayment of fees and affidavit (Salem, Maurice) Modified text on 10/28/2020 (mlc).
October 26, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand for injunction and damages and Motion for Leave to File Verified Complaint in this Venue against Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission, Jerome Larkin filed by Maurice James Salem (Attachments: #1 Proposed Verified Complaint, #2 Exhibit A, Defendant Agency, Illinois ARDC, Official Website, #3 Exhibit B, Article in the Chicago Law Bulletin, #4 Exhibit C, Decision by Defendant Agency's Highest Administrative Appellate Body) (Salem, Maurice) Modified text on 10/28/2020 (mlc).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Salem v. Larkin et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MAURICE JAMES SALEM
Represented By: Maurice J. Salem
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JEROME LARKIN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ILLINOIS ATTORNEY REGISTRATION) AND DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?