Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Novoselsky v. Larkin et al
as 1:2023cv00484
Plaintiff:
David Alan Novoselsky
Defendant:
Jerome Larkin, Scott Renfroe and Benjamin Borougf
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Maurice Salem v. Illinois Attorney Registration and Discipinary Com, et al
as 22-3222
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAURICE J. SALEM
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY REGISTRATION & DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION, an Illinois state agency and JEROME LARKIN, officially and individually
Ring v. Larkin, et al
as 1:2022cv00895
Plaintiff:
Sheryl Melanie Ring and Sheryl Ring
Defendant:
Jerome Larkin, Amy Bowne, John H. Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Civil Rights
Novoselsky v. Larkin et al
as 1:2021cv03117
Plaintiff:
David Alan Novoselsky
Defendant:
Jerome Larkin, Scott Renfroe and Benjamin Borough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maurice J. Salem v. John J. Tharp, Jr.
as 20-3310
Interested Party:
JEROME LARKIN and ATTORNEY REGISTRATION & DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION
Respondent:
JOHN J. THARP, JR.
Petitioner:
MAURICE J. SALEM
Salem v. Larkin et al
as 1:2020cv06531
Plaintiff:
Maurice James Salem
Defendant:
Illinois Attorney Registration and Discipinary Commission and Jerome Larkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Salem v. Larkin et al
as 2:2020cv00220
Plaintiff:
MAURICE JAMES SALEM
Defendant:
JEROME LARKIN, ILLINOIS ATTORNEY REGISTRATION) AND DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION and Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mullen et al v. Tiverton School District et al
as 1:2020cv00179
Defendant:
Elaine Pavao, Deborah Pallasch, Tiverton School District and others
Plaintiff:
NEA Tiverton and Amy Mullen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garner et al v. Door & Window Guard Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv10553
Defendant:
Althea Kuller, PC Development Inc, Luis Vera and others
Plaintiff:
James Garner and Tina Turner
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
