Tishomingo Railroad Company, Inc. et al v. BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2006cv00343
Filed: December 20, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi
Office: Eastern Division Office
Presiding Judge: Neal B. Biggers
Presiding Judge: Jerry A. Davis
Nature of Suit: Torts to Land
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Petition for Removal
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 22, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 256 ORDER denying 215 Motion for payment of costs relating to survey. Signed by Neal B. Biggers on 09/21/2011. (llw)
September 21, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 254 ORDER denying 221 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Neal B. Biggers on 9/21/2011. (llw)
September 22, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 214 CLERK'S JUDGMENT in favor of BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. against Tishomingo Railroad Company, Inc., R. Bruce Crawford. CASE CLOSED. Signed by Neal B. Biggers on 09/22/10. (nsm, USDC)
September 21, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 213 MEMORANDUM OPINION re 212 Order. Signed by Neal B. Biggers on 09/21/2010. (llw, USDC)
September 24, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER denying 28 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Neal B. Biggers on 09/24/2009. (llw, USDC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tishomingo Railroad Company, Inc. et al v. BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?