Salts v. Epps et al
| Marie Salts |
| Christopher Epps and Jim Hood |
| 1:2008cv00182 |
| July 21, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
| Habeas Corpus (General) Office |
| Lee |
| Michael P. Mills |
| Jerry A. Davis |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
56
ORDER denying (38) Motion ; granting in part and denying in part (48) Motion to Stay; granting (30) Motion in case 1:08-cv-00182-WAP-JAD; granting in part and denying in part (32) Motion to Stay; denying (22) Motion in case 1:08-cv-00183-WAP-JAD. Signed by W. Allen Pepper on 3/29/10. Associated Cases: 1:08-cv-00182-WAP-JAD, 1:08-cv-00183-WAP-JAD (pwh, USDC)
|
|
Filing
46
FINAL JUDGMENT in favor of Marie Salts against Christopher Epps, Jim Hood. Signed by W. Allen Pepper on 3/11/10. Associated Cases: 1:08-cv-00182-WAP-JAD, 1:08-cv-00183-WAP-JAD(cr, USDC)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER in case 1:08-cv-00182 denying (25) Motion to Deny Respondents' Request for Additional Time and to Strike Objections as Untimely. GRANTING in case no. 1:08cv193 (23) Motion for Additional Time Within Which to File Objections to Report and Recommendation. Signed by W. Allen Pepper on 7/29/2009. Associated Cases: 1:08-cv-00182-WAP-JAD, 1:08-cv-00183-WAP-JAD (pbs, USDC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
