Coggins v. Autozone Mississippi, Inc.
Plaintiff: Stuart Keith Coggins
Defendant: Autozone Mississippi, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2008cv00201
Filed: August 15, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi
Office: P.I.: Other Office
County: Monroe
Presiding Judge: Glen H. Davidson
Presiding Judge: Jerry A. Davis
Nature of Suit: Defendant
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 13, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 61 MEMORANDUM OPINION re 60 Order on Motion to Set Aside Default,,,, Order on Motion to Dismiss,, Order on Motion to Continue,. Signed by Senior Judge Glen H. Davidson on 8/13/09. (rel, USDC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Coggins v. Autozone Mississippi, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stuart Keith Coggins
Represented By: John A. Ferrell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Autozone Mississippi, Inc.
Represented By: William O. Luckett, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?