Walker v. Johnson et al
Bobby Edward Walker |
Jim H. Johnson, Tony Carleton, Dorothy McDaniels, M. Bridges, Harold Caffin, Chris Nolden, Brian Hall, Lee County Board of Supervisors, Phil Morgan, Bobby nmi Smith, Charles R. Duke, Tommie Lee Ivy and Glenell Weeks |
1:2008cv00292 |
January 29, 2009 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
Prison Condition Office |
Lee |
Neal B. Biggers |
Jerry A. Davis |
None |
Federal Question |
42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 102 ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS and ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - Objections to R&R OVERRULED; R&R 99 APPROVED AND ADOPTED as opinion of the court; complaint DISMISSED with prejudice; CASE CLOSED. Signed by Neal B. Biggers on 8/30/10. (cr, USDC) |
Filing 91 FINAL JUDGMENT adopting Report and Recommendations re 88 Report and Recommendations. Defendant Harold Chaffin is DISMISSED with prejudice; matter shall proceed as to the remaining Defendants. Signed by Neal B. Biggers on 4/12/10. (cr, USDC) |
Filing 40 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, dismissing plaintiff's claims against defendants Morgan, Smith, Duke, Ivy, Weeks, and the Board of Supervisors with prejudice. The plaintiff's claims of excessive force and denial of medical care against defendants Johnson, Carleto, McDaniels, Bridges, Caffin, Nolden and Hall shall proceed. Signed by Neal B. Biggers on 6/24/2009. (tce, USDC) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.