Richloom Fabrics Group v. Huntington Fabrics, Inc.
Richloom Fabrics Group |
Huntington Fabrics, Inc. |
1:2009cv00090 |
April 6, 2009 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
Copyright Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Sharion Aycock |
Jerry A. Davis |
None |
Federal Question |
17:101 Copyright Infringement |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 AGREED ORDER granting 4 Permanent Injunction. Signed by District Judge Sharion Aycock on 4/24/2009. (khj, USDC) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Richloom Fabrics Group v. Huntington Fabrics, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Richloom Fabrics Group | |
Represented By: | Rachel M. Pierce |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Huntington Fabrics, Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.