Winstead v. Box
Plaintiff: Karen Winstead
Defendant: Randy Box
Case Number: 1:2009cv00104
Filed: April 17, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi
Office: Civil Rights: Other Office
County: Lee
Presiding Judge: Jerry A. Davis
Presiding Judge: W. Allen Pepper
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 13, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 67 MEMORANDUM OPINION re 66 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Senior Judge Glen H. Davidson on 2/13/12. (rel)
April 1, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER. Signed by W. Allen Pepper on 4/1/2011. (pls)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Winstead v. Box
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Karen Winstead
Represented By: Victor Israel Fleitas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Randy Box
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?