Harshberger v. Hill-Rom Company, Inc.
Plaintiff: Marla Harshberger
Defendant: Hill-Rom Company, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2010cv00227
Filed: September 16, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi
Office: Eastern Division Office
County: Lee
Presiding Judge: Glen H. Davidson
Presiding Judge: Jerry A. Davis
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 170 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ; denying 150 Motion ; granting 154 Motion ; adopting Report and Recommendations re 168 Report and Recommendations.. Signed by Senior Judge Glen H. Davidson on 4/26/13. (rel)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Harshberger v. Hill-Rom Company, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marla Harshberger
Represented By: Rachel M. Pierce
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hill-Rom Company, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?