Shannon v. Fountainbleau Management Services, LLC
Plaintiff: Terry Shannon
Defendant: Fountainbleau Management Services, LLC
Case Number: 1:2010cv00294
Filed: November 15, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi
Office: Eastern Division Office
County: Lee
Presiding Judge: Sharion Aycock
Presiding Judge: Jerry A. Davis
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 6, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MEMORANDUM OPINION re 13 Order on Motion to Remand to State Court, Order on Motion in Limine. Signed by District Judge Sharion Aycock on 7/6/11. (sba)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shannon v. Fountainbleau Management Services, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Terry Shannon
Represented By: William Lawrence Deas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fountainbleau Management Services, LLC
Represented By: Stephen H. Biller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?