Stafford v. City of West Point, Mississippi et al
Plaintiff: Natalie Stafford
Defendant: Victory Marketing, LLC, Mark Stafford, Stanley McCree, Mississippi Adult Companies, LLC and Tennessee Entertainment and City of West Point, Mississippi
Case Number: 1:2011cv00013
Filed: January 13, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi
Office: Eastern Division Office
County: Clay
Presiding Judge: Sharion Aycock
Presiding Judge: Jerry A. Davis
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 157 ORDER granting 156 Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice as to ALL DEFENDANTS. Signed by District Judge Sharion Aycock on 9/26/2013. (psk)
May 23, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 141 MEMORANDUM OPINION re 140 Order on Motions for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Sharion Aycock on 5/23/2013. (psk)
March 30, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 46 MEMORANDUM OPINION re 45 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Sharion Aycock on 3/30/2012. (psk)
July 7, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 34 MEMORANDUM OPINION re 33 Order on Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Sharion Aycock on 7/7/2011. (psk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stafford v. City of West Point, Mississippi et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Victory Marketing, LLC
Represented By: Robert P. Thompson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mark Stafford
Represented By: J. Lawson Hester
Represented By: Jason Edward Dare
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stanley McCree
Represented By: Jason Edward Dare
Represented By: J. Lawson Hester
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mississippi Adult Companies, LLC and Tennessee Entertainment
Represented By: William Matthew Vines
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of West Point, Mississippi
Represented By: J. Lawson Hester
Represented By: Jason Edward Dare
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Natalie Stafford
Represented By: Robert H. Burress, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?