Powertrain, Inc. v. Ma et al
| Powertrain, Inc. |
| Joyce Ma and Best Machinery & Electrical, Inc. |
| 1:2011cv00105 |
| May 3, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
| Eastern Division Office |
| Tishomingo |
| Sharion Aycock |
| Jerry A. Davis |
| Contract Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
284
ORDER denying 279 Motion for New Trial; re 283 Memorandum Opinion. Signed by Senior Judge Glen H. Davidson on 2/17/2015. (dlh)
|
|
Filing
277
FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW in favor of Joyce Ma against Powertrain, Inc.. CASE CLOSED. Signed by Senior Judge Glen H. Davidson on 10/28/14. (rel)
|
|
Filing
238
MEMORANDUM OPINION re 237 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment,. Signed by Senior Judge Glen H. Davidson on 8/11/14. (rel)
|
|
Filing
235
MEMORANDUM OPINION re 234 Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim,, Order on Motion for Sanctions,, Order on Motion for Summary Judgment,. Signed by Senior Judge Glen H. Davidson on 8/8/14. (rel)
|
|
Filing
118
MEMORANDUM OPINION re 117 Order. Signed by Senior Judge Glen H. Davidson on 10/24/13. (rel)
|
|
Filing
23
MEMORANDUM OPINION re 22 Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, Order on Motion to Dismiss/Lack of Jurisdiction,. Signed by Senior Judge Glen H. Davidson on 2/27/12. (rel)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
