Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation v. Olive et al
| Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation |
| Arrell Olive and Thomas L. Olive |
| 1:2011cv00147 |
| June 27, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
| Eastern Division Office |
| Attala |
| Glen H Davidson |
| David A Sanders |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2011. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER DISMISSING CASE by reason of Suggestion of Bankruptcy. CASE CLOSED. Signed by Senior Judge Glen H. Davidson on 8/1/11. (rel)
|
| Filing 4 SUGGESTION OF BANKRUPTCY Upon the Record as to Arrell Olive and Thomas L. Olive . (Spencer, J.) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by J. Fred Spencer, Jr on behalf of Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation Thomas L. Olive served on 7/8/2011. (Spencer, J.) |
| Case Reassigned from Jerry A. Davis to David A. Sanders. For chambers contact information please see the following web site. ** www.msnd.uscourts.gov/judicialofficers.htm ** (jla) |
| NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Glen H. Davidson and Magistrate Judge Jerry A. Davis. (tab) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Arrell Olive, Thomas L. Olive. (tab) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Arrell Olive, Thomas L. Olive, Filing fee $ 350, receipt number MSN300005446, filed by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (tab) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
