Rogers v. Lee County, Miss. et al
| Kermit O. Rogers |
| Lee County, Miss., City of Tupelo, Miss., Jim H. Johnson, North Mississippi Narcotics Unit, Samuel T. Warren and Paul Howell |
| 1:2013cv00243 |
| December 23, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
| Aberdeen Division Office |
| Lee |
| Sharion Aycock |
| David A. Sanders |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
206
AGREED ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by District Judge Sharion Aycock on 10/18/2017. (adm)
|
|
Filing
200
ORDER DISMISSING CASE by reason of settlement. CASE CLOSED. Signed by District Judge Sharion Aycock on 7/13/2017. (adm)
|
|
Filing
184
MEMORANDUM OPINION re 183 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Sharion Aycock on 7/13/2016. (psk)
|
|
Filing
169
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 160 Motion for Reconsideration. This case is REOPENED as to the individual officers, Samuel T. Warren and Paul Howell. Signed by District Judge Sharion Aycock on 3/28/2016. (psk)
|
|
Filing
159
MEMORANDUM OPINION re 158 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Sharion Aycock on 5/29/2015. (psk)
|
|
Filing
138
MEMORANDUM OPINION re 137 Order on Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Sharion Aycock on 3/31/2015. (psk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
