Bouchillon v. Same Deutz-Fahr, Group et al
Plaintiff: Judy Bouchillon
Defendant: Same Deutz-Fahr, Group, Same Deutz-Fahr North America, Inc. and Deutz AG
Case Number: 1:2014cv00135
Filed: August 12, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi
Office: Aberdeen Division Office
County: Winston
Presiding Judge: Sharion Aycock
Presiding Judge: David A. Sanders
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury- Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 4, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 249 ORDER regarding Compensation to Special Master. Signed by District Judge Debra M. Brown on 4/3/18. (jla)
July 24, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 234 ORDER denying as moot 208 Motion to Change Venue. Signed by District Judge Debra M. Brown on 7/24/17. (rel)
July 5, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 232 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - Motion 135 GRANTED; motion 81 DENIED; motion 100 GRANTED; motion 229 GRANTED; motion 228 GRANTED in Part and DENIED in Part; SAME Deutz-Fahr North America Inc., SAME Deutz-Fahr, Group and SAME Deutz-Fahr Deutschland, GmbH are DISMISSED from this action. Signed by District Judge Debra M. Brown on 7/5/17. (cr)
February 7, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 225 ORDER RESUBMITTING 215 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION with instructions to include an answer to Questions 4, 5 and 6; Ebke shall submit his resubmitted report and recommendation with answers to the questions no later than April 15, 2017 or seek an exten sion; OBJECTIONS AND/OR MOTIONS regarding the resubmitted report and recommendation due no later than 21 days after the filing of the resubmitted report and recommendation; FINDING AS MOOT Motions 218 , 219 , 220 to adopt and/or modify the report and recommendation ; FINDING AS MOOT 224 Motion for Leave to Provide Motion and Exhibit to Special Master; STAYING this action until the filing of the resubmitted report and recommendation. Signed by District Judge Debra M. Brown on 2/7/17. (rel)
March 10, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 162 ORDER granting 97 Motion for Appointment of Special Master. Signed by District Judge Sharion Aycock on 3/10/2016. (geb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bouchillon v. Same Deutz-Fahr, Group et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Judy Bouchillon
Represented By: William Edward Ballard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Same Deutz-Fahr, Group
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Same Deutz-Fahr North America, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Deutz AG
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?