Harvey v. Golden Dragon Sourcing Ltd Corporation et al
Tonia Harvey |
Golden Dragon Sourcing Ltd Corporation and Seventh Avenue, Inc. |
1:2016cv00171 |
September 20, 2016 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
Aberdeen Division Office |
Winston |
Sharion Aycock |
David A. Sanders |
Personal Injury- Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 127 ORDER AND JUDGMENT in favor of Tonia Harvey against Guangdong Kisense Co., Ltd.. CASE CLOSED. Signed by District Judge Sharion Aycock on 9/21/2020. (sko) |
Filing 115 ORDER granting 114 Motion to Vacate and reopening case against Defendant Guangdong Kisense Co. only. A hearing on damages will be set by separate notice. Signed by District Judge Sharion Aycock on 9/3/2019. (dbm) |
Filing 113 ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice by reason of settlement. CASE CLOSED. Signed by District Judge Sharion Aycock on 6/24/2019. (ray) |
Filing 103 AGREED ORDER Dismissing Defendant Golden Dragon Sourcing LTD Corporation, without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Sharion Aycock on 4/8/2019 (dbm) |
Filing 89 DEFAULT JUDGMENT against Defendant Guangdong Kisense Co., Ltd. Signed by District Judge Sharion Aycock on 11/27/2018. (dbm) |
Filing 78 ORDER denying 48 Motion to Dismiss without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Sharion Aycock on 2/12/2018. (dbm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.