Oatis v. 21st Mortgage
Plaintiff: Garrick Oatis
Defendant: 21st Mortgage
Case Number: 1:2016cv00228
Filed: December 20, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi
Office: Aberdeen Division Office
County: Prentiss
Presiding Judge: Glen H. Davidson
Presiding Judge: David A. Sanders
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 05:552
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 25, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 22 MEMORANDUM OPINION re 21 Order on Motion to Stay. Signed by Senior Judge Glen H. Davidson on 7/25/17. (rel)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Oatis v. 21st Mortgage
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Garrick Oatis
Represented By: Gregory John Bosseler
Represented By: Amy M. Ferrera
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 21st Mortgage
Represented By: C. Meade Hartfield
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?