Rush v. Webster County Department of Human Services et al
Zorri N. Rush |
Webster County Department of Human Services, Annie Patterson and Ann Hitt |
1:2018cv00196 |
November 5, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
Sharion Aycock |
Roy Percy |
Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1343 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 MOTION for Relief by Zorri N. Rush. (jtm) |
Filing 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Zorri N. Rush Objections to R&R due by 1/4/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy Percy on 12/21/18. (bnd) |
Filing 8 ORDER denying #6 Motion for Pro/Bono or Conservatorship; denying #7 Motion for Email Communication. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy Percy on 12/21/18. (bnd) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Email Communication by Zorri N. Rush. (jtm) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Pro Bono or Conservatorship by Zorri N. Rush. (jtm) |
Filing 5 AMENDMENT to #1 Complaint. (jtm) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Pro Se Consent & Registration to Receive Documents Electronically (jtm) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Sharion Aycock and Magistrate Judge Roy Percy. (jtm) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Zorri N. Rush. (jtm) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT, filed by Zorri N. Rush. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jtm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.