Smith v. King et al
| Charles Smith, Jr. |
| Attorney General of the State of Mississippi and Ronald King |
| 1:2019cv00117 |
| June 13, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
| Debra M Brown |
| Glen H Davidson |
| David A Sanders |
| Jane M Virden |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER granting (28) Motion for Reconsideration ; granting (29) Motion for Reconsideration ; granting (30) Motion for Reconsideration in case 1:17-cv-00184-GHD-DAS; finding as moot (2) Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis in case 1:19-cv-00117-GHD-DAS; REOPENING CASE and CONSOLIDATING with 1:19cv117. Signed by Senior Judge Glen H. Davidson on 7/22/19. Associated Cases: 1:17-cv-00184-GHD-DAS, 1:19-cv-00117-GHD-DAS (jla)
|
| Case reassigned to Senior Judge Glen H. Davidson and Magistrate Judge David A. Sanders. District Judge Debra M. Brown, Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden no longer assigned to the case. (jla) |
| Filing 4 Letter/Correspondence from Charles Smith Jr.. (jla) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Debra M. Brown and Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden. (cr) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Charles Smith, Jr. (cr) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Clay) filed by Charles Smith, Jr. (cr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
