Lenoir (DO NOT FILE) v. State of Mississippi et al
Robert Lenoir (DO NOT FILE) |
State of Mississippi and The Attorney General of the State of Mississippi |
1:2019cv00209 |
November 18, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
Debra M Brown |
Jane M Virden |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 USCA ORDER DISMISSING Successive Habeas for failure to comply with 12/6/19 Court Order. Signed by Clerk on 1/7/19. (jla) |
Filing 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT re #5 Transfer Case to 5th Circuit. (jla) |
Filing 6 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT re #4 Order on Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis. (jla) |
Filing 5 ORDER transferring petition to U.S. Court of Appeals - 5th Circuit to determine if petitioner is allowed to file successive habeas petition in this court. Signed by District Judge Debra M. Brown on 12/3/19. (tab) |
Filing 4 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden on 12/2/19. (jla) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Brown and Magistrate Judge Virden. (jla) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Robert Lenoir (DO NOT FILE). (jla) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Clay County), filed by Robert Lenoir (DO NOT FILE). (jla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.