Randle-Johnson v. Grammer, Inc.
Lurienda L. Randle-Johnson |
Grammer, Inc. |
1:2020cv00247 |
December 11, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
Neal B Biggers |
Roy Percy |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1343 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 TEXT ONLY ORDER requiring telephonic case management conference. Counsel should call conference line 888-363-4735 (participant number 4317261) at previously scheduled time. There will be no in-person attendance permitted. No further written order shall issue from the court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy Percy on 1/22/21. No document attached. (rtc) |
CLERK'S NOTICE OF CORRECTION re #10 Notice of Attorney Appearance; Attorney to refile each motion with the signature of resident attorney as required by L.U.Civ.R. 83.1(d)(4)(K). Attorney will be directed to refile in the future. (jla) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Ronald D. Scott Williams on behalf of Grammer, Inc. (Williams, Ronald D.) |
Filing 9 ORDER granting #5 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice; Attorney Ronald D. Scott Williams. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy Percy on 1/6/21. (bnd) |
Filing 8 CORPORATE STATEMENT . (Lassiter, John) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Grammer, Inc.. (Lassiter, John) |
Filing 6 INITIAL ORDER - RULE 16.1 Case Management Conference set for 2/16/2021 10:00 AM in Judge Percy Chambers before Magistrate Judge Roy Percy. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy Percy on 1/5/2021. (rtc) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice ; Attorney Ronald D. Scott Williams,(Paid $150 PHV fee; receipt number 0537-1890764) by Grammer, Inc.. (Lassiter, John) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by John Martin Lassiter on behalf of Grammer, Inc. (Lassiter, John) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Richard Shane McLaughlin on behalf of Lurienda L. Randle-Johnson Grammer, Inc. served on 12/15/2020. (McLaughlin, Richard) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Grammer, Inc. Returned to attorney by email for service. (jwr) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT, Jury Demand, Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0537-1884796, filed by Lurienda L. Randle-Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (Charge of Discrimination), #2 Exhibit B (EEOC Notice of Right to Sue), #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (jwr) |
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Biggers and Magistrate Judge Percy. (jwr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Randle-Johnson v. Grammer, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Grammer, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Ronald D. Scott Williams |
Represented By: | John Martin Lassiter |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Lurienda L. Randle-Johnson | |
Represented By: | Rachel Pierce Waide |
Represented By: | Richard Shane McLaughlin |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.