Smith v. Walmart, Inc. et al
| Allison-Gail Smith |
| Regis Corporation doing business as Smart Style Salon, Walmart, Inc. and John Does 1-4 |
| 1:2021cv00043 |
| March 1, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
| Sharion Aycock |
| David A Sanders |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
INITIAL ORDER - RULE 16.1 Telephonic Case Management Conference set for 5/24/2021 at 10:00 AM from Amory Tele-Conference before Magistrate Judge David A. Sanders. Proposed Case Management Order and Confidential Settlement Memos due by 5/10/2021. PLEASE READ THE INITIAL ORDER CAREFULLY AS IT CONTAINS NEW INFORMATION RELATIVE TO THE SUBMISSION OF PROPOSED CMO'S AND CONFIDENTIAL MEMOS. Signed by Magistrate Judge David A. Sanders on 4/12/2021. (jf)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF SERVICE of Walmart's Responses to Plaintiff's First Set of Interrogatories and Walmart's Responses to Plaintiff's First Set of Requests for Production of Documents by Caroline C. Johnson on behalf of Walmart, Inc. to Counsel for Plaintiff and Counsel for Defendant Regis Corporation. (Johnson, Caroline) |
| Filing 9 STATE COURT RECORD - REMOVAL. (Williams, Hubert) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE OF CORRECTION re #1 Notice of Removal; Attorney to file State Court Record as required by L.U.Civ.R. 5(b). (jla) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF SERVICE of Responses to Requests for Admissions by Hubert Wesley Williams, III on behalf of Regis Corporation to Allison-Gail Smith, Individually and on Behalf of the Wrongful Death Beneficiaries of Grace Vandygriff (Plaintiff). (Williams, Hubert) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF SERVICE of Responses to Requests for Admission by Thomas M. Louis on behalf of Walmart, Inc. to Plaintiff. (Louis, Thomas) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to State Court Complaint by Regis Corporation. (Williams, Hubert) Modified on 3/8/2021 (jla). |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Walmart, Inc.. (Louis, Thomas) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Caroline C. Johnson on behalf of Walmart, Inc. (Johnson, Caroline) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Thomas M. Louis on behalf of Walmart, Inc. (Louis, Thomas) |
| NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Aycock and Magistrate Judge Sanders. (jla) |
| Filing 2 STATE COURT COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Allison-Gail Smith. (jla) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Regis Corporation, Walmart, Inc. from Lee County Circuit Court, case number CV21-006(PF)L. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AMSNDC-1914304) Pursuant to Local Uniform Civil Rule 5(b) and the Administrative Procedures for Electronic Case Filing for the Northern District of Mississippi, the removing defendant must electronically file a copy of the entire state court record within 14 days of the date of removal. The state court record will be filed using the event State Court Record - Removal. Attach the Notice/Certificate of Filing State Court Record as the main document with each state court document attached as a separate PDF. All attachments must be clearly identified. The state court record can not be filed conventionally., filed by Regis Corporation, Walmart, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Medical Bills, #2 Exhibit B - 2021-02-24 Copy Request, #3 Exhibit Process & Pleadgins served on Regis and Walmart, #4 Summons Regis, #5 Summons Walmart) (jla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
