Wilkes v. Cargill, Inc.
Steven C. Wilkes |
Cargill, Inc. |
1:2022cv00012 |
January 11, 2022 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
Glen H Davidson |
David A Sanders |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 ORDER denying #15 Motion to Set Aside. Signed by Senior Judge Glen H. Davidson on 12/5/22. (jla) |
Filing 17 MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION re #16 Response in Opposition to Motion, #15 MOTION to Set Aside . (Halbert, Mark) |
Filing 16 RESPONSE in Opposition re #15 MOTION to Set Aside filed by Cargill, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1- August 2022 Email Exchange) (Halbert, Mark) |
Filing 15 MOTION to Set Aside by Steven C. Wilkes. (Woodard, Stephanie) |
Filing 14 ORDER granting #11 Motion to Dismiss; CASE CLOSED. Signed by Senior Judge Glen H. Davidson on 9/6/22. (jla) |
Filing 13 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Senior Judge Glen H. Davidson on 9/6/22. (jla) |
Filing 12 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT re #11 MOTION to Dismiss OR, ALTERNATIVELY, MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT . (Halbert, Mark) |
Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss OR, ALTERNATIVELY, MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT by Cargill, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declaration of Stacey Rice) (Halbert, Mark) Modified on 5/31/2022 (jla). |
Filing 10 ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Cargill, Inc. answer due 5/27/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge David A. Sanders on 5/18/22. (cs) |
Filing 9 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint - UNOPPOSED by Cargill, Inc.. (Halbert, Mark) |
Filing 8 ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Cargill, Inc. answer due 5/18/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge David A. Sanders on 5/4/22. (cs) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint - UNOPPOSED by Cargill, Inc.. (Halbert, Mark) |
Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE of Incomplete Process as to Cargill, Inc. (jla) |
Filing 5 Summons Reissued as to Cargill, Inc. Emailed to attorney for service. (jwr) |
Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE of Incomplete Process as to Cargill, Inc. (jla) |
Filing 3 CLERK'S NOTICE of Incomplete Process as to Cargill, Inc. (jla) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Cargill, Inc.; emailed to Attorney for service. (jla) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT, Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AMSNDC-2046645, filed by Steven C. Wilkes. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jla) |
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Davidson and Magistrate Judge Sanders. (jla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Wilkes v. Cargill, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Steven C. Wilkes | |
Represented By: | Stephanie Smith Woodard |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Cargill, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Mark Nolan Halbert |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.